The governance
control plane.
Not a data pipeline.
Cloud platforms answer: "Can this message be delivered?"
Fundamentum answers: "Should this action be allowed?"
These are categorically different questions. Hyperscalers solve the first with exceptional efficiency. None provides the second — the governance layer that decides what a fleet is allowed to do. That is why 74% of IoT projects fail.
Three pillars. One control plane.
A governance architecture institutionalizes the rules that currently live in the memory of the engineers who built the system. At 500 devices, that memory works. At 5,000, it fails.
The governed firmware update
In an ungoverned system, a firmware update is a publish operation. In Fundamentum, it is a four-stage authorization workflow.
Every action is recorded in the tamper-evident audit trail. The incident timeline is reconstructed from proof — not from log archaeology.
The cloud is infrastructure.
Fundamentum is authority.
The hyperscaler stack was engineered to solve connectivity with exceptional efficiency. It was not designed to solve authorization. Fundamentum is the governed system you build on top of that infrastructure.
- Cloud-agnostic: can interface with AWS, Azure or Google Cloud if you require it — without lock-in
- Application-agnostic: enforcement cannot be bypassed by application code
- Connectivity-flexible: Cellular (LTE-M, 5G), LoRaWAN, Wi-SUN, DigiMesh, Wirepas
- OEM-embeddable: governance as a product layer, not a service wrapper
115 questions IoT decision-makers ask — answered
From "why do IoT projects fail?" through build-vs-buy, technical evaluation, procurement risk and Canadian data sovereignty — the questions Heads of Development, CTOs, CFOs and project managers actually search for, each answered for Fundamentum, the IoT governance control plane.